The High Court ordered the dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, with a liberty to avail alternative remedy, following prior court directions regarding representation.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed with liberty to avail alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 2058 of 2016
Date of decision : 19.01.2017
Som Nath
....Petitioner
V/s
Jatinder Singh Aulakh
....Respondent
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Jaideep Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. V. Ramswaroop, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
RAJAN GUPTA J.
Learned State counsel submits that pursuant to directions given by this court in CRM M-17539 of 2016, representation of the petitioner has been decided. Thus, no cause of action survives in this petition.
In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy, if any.
Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
January 19, 2017 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
Ajay Kumar 2017.01.21 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Som Nath
Jatinder Singh Aulakh
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
