This oral order dismissed the writ petition by the High Court at Chandigarh, ruling that the State counsel's demonstration of compliance by the writ court order resulted in the extinction of the cause of action.
Petition dismissed as cause of action no longer survives due to compliance with the writ court order; liberty granted to make representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1830-2016 (O & M) Date of decision: 27.01.2017
Ashok Yadav and ors.
…. Petitioners
V/s
R.S. Kharab, Director, Elementary Education, Haryana.
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Dr. Sushil Gautam, DAG, Haryana.
Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel, at the outset, submits that the order passed by the writ court has been complied with. He has referred to Para 3 of the affidavit filed by Dr. R.S. Kharab, Director Elementary Education, Haryana, in support of his contentions.
In view of the above, no cause of action survives in this petition. Same is hereby dismissed.
Petitioners, however, shall be at liberty to make a representation to the competent authority, in case, they have still any grouse regarding decision taken by the authority.
(RAJAN GUPTA) January 27, 2017 JUDGE sukhpreet
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sukhpreet Kaur 2017.02.02 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ashok Yadav and ors.
R.S. Kharab, Director, Elementary Education, Haryana
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
