The petitioner, through counsel, informed the court of its instructions to withdraw the petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
COCP No. 2228 of 2016 Date of Decision: January 24, 2017.
Suresh Kumar Aggarwal
....Petitioner
Versus
Nirmaljit Singh Kalsi and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Ms. Amanpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr.HNS Gill, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.V.Ramswaroop, Addl.A.G., Punjab
Rajan Gupta, J (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has
instructions to withdraw this petition.
In view of statement made by her, this petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Rajan Gupta) Judge
January 24, 2017. BB
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Suresh Kumar Aggarwal
Nirmaljit Singh Kalsi
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
