Allowed

Sanjay @ Sanjay Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC28 Nov 2016CWP/23634/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted a single notice of motion to respondent No.1, 3, and 4. It directed the Land Acquisition Collector, Rohtak, to verify facts and forward any pending reference under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to the competent court within one month.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Land Acquisition Collector, Rohtak to verify facts and forward pending reference to competent court within one month.

Sanjay @ Sanjay Singh Vs State of Haryana & Ors. — Land Acquisition | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.23634 of 2016. Date of Decision: November 28, 2016

¶3

Sanjay @ Sanjay Singh

¶4

......Petitioner

¶5

versus

¶6

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA.

¶8

¶9

Present: Ms.Kamlesh Khatri, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶10

-.-

¶11

Surya Kant, J . (Oral)

¶12

Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1, 3 & 4 only at this stage. On our asking, Ms.Palika Monga, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on their behalf.

¶13

Let three copies of the writ petition be supplied to learned State counsel during the course of day failing which this order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶14

In view of the nature of order which we propose to pass, it is not necessary to seek any counter-reply from respondent Nos.1, 3 & 4 or to serve respondent No.2 at this stage as no order prejudicial to their interest is being passed.

¶15

The petitioner is said to have filed reference under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking apportionment of compensation. Since the opposite party against whom such apportionment claim is raised, are not party-respondents, it is not appropriate for this Court to express any opinion on merits. Suffice to observe that if any reference has been filed in Mohinder Kumar Kambojaccordance with law, the Land Acquisition Collector is required to forward 2017.01.10 11:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶16

CWP No.23634 of 2016

¶17

[2]

¶18

the same to the court of competent jurisdiction for its adjudication on merits.

¶19

We thus dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Land Acquisition Collector, Rohtak to verify the facts and if any such reference is lying pending before him, let the same be forwarded to the court of competent jurisdiction within a period of one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

¶20

Ordered accordingly.

¶21

Dasti.

¶22

	[SURYA KANT] JUDGE
November 28, 2016 mohinder	[SUDIP AHLUWALIA] JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned	: Yes/No
Whether Reportable	: Yes/No

¶23

Mohinder Kumar Kamboj 2017.01.10 11:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Sanjay @ Sanjay Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay @ Sanjay Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ishwar Singh and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Yashi Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Sunil Dutt Sharma Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Khushant Gaba Vs Asst.Director Directorate of Enforcement

Amarjeet Singh Kooner Vs State of Punjab

Lachhman Singh & Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.