A petition challenging land acquisition proceedings was disposed of as infructuous since the concerned land acquisition proceedings had been dropped by the authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-17353-2015 Date of Decision: November 23, 2016
Ishwar Singh and others
.....Petitioners
Versus
The State of Haryana and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA
1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes/No 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No. 3. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No
.......
Present: Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.R.D.Sharma, DAG, Haryana.
SURYA KANT, J.
Learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, has placed on record the Memo dated 08.08.2016 informing that the impugned land acquisition proceedings have since been dropped. Consequently, the land/property of the petitioners is not being acquired.
In this view of the matter, the writ petition has been rendered
infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.
| ( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE |
||
|---|---|---|
| November 23, 2016 | ( SUDIP AHLUWA | LIA ) |
| meenuss | JUDGE | |
| 1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? 2. Whether reportable ? |
Yes/No Yes/No |
Meenu 2016.12.02 13:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Ishwar Singh and others
The State of Haryana and others
SURYA KANT
SUDIP AHLUWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
