Petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking quashing of notices issued by respondents. The petitioner moved to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue alternative remedies. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to utilize alternative remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-21666-2016
Date of decision: 20.10.2016
Mrs. Ganga Devi
..... Petitioner
Versus
The Corporation Bank and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. SK Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
October 20, 2016 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Rishu Kataria 2016.10.21 11:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Mrs. Ganga Devi
The Corporation Bank and others
Ajay Kumar Mittal
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
