The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held that a writ petition challenging an interim order staying promotions is rendered infructuous after the original application was allowed by the CAT.
Disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
116 Civil Writ Petition No.18602 of 2016 Date of Decision: October 19, 2016
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and another
....Petitioners
versus
Swinderjit Singh and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. K.B. Sharma, Advocate for Mr. D.R. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
October 19, 2016 sonia gugnani
(RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes/No
Whether reportable?
Yes/No
Sonia Kinra 2016.10.21 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
Swinderjit Singh
Ajay Kumar Mittal
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
