Writ petition seeking mandatory writ for vacant possession of a plot and refund of deposit. Court disposed of case by directing respondent to decide refund claim within three months after hearing.
Directed respondent No.2 to decide refund claim within three months after hearing petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
CWP No.15604 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.15604 of 2015 Date of decision: 04.10.2016
Joginder Singh Rataul
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: - Mr. Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. S.C. Pathela, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution has been made for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondents to hand over the vacant physical possession of plot No.314-B situated at Mall Mandi (Shri Guru Teg Bahadur Nagar) Amritsar to the petitioner in view of allotment letter dated 30.12.2009 (Annexure P-1) in favour of the petitioner, further prayer has been made for directing the respondents to refund the amount of ` 3,17,645/-, which has been deposited by the petitioner for transferring the plot in the name of his son Sh. Manjit Singh and claim has also been made that respondents be restrained from charging any interest/penal interest or any incidental charges from the petitioner till the vacant physical possession of the plot in question is handed over to the petitioner and his son along with all basic amenities.
On 27.09.2016, on the statement made by learned counsel for
Ravinder Singh 2016.10.06 13:43 2. I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
-2-
CWP No.15604 of 2015
respondents No.2 and 3 petitioner was directed to appear before Sh. Mohan Lal, Junior Engineer on 03.10.2016 for getting the physical possession of the property in dispute. Learned counsel for the parties state that son of the petitioner had approached the Junior Engineer on 29.09.2016 and possession of the said property has been delivered to him on behalf of the petitioner. Photocopy of the possession slip has been produced in Court, which is taken on record.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
(RAMENDRA JAIN) 04.10.2016 JUDGE R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Ravinder Singh 2016.10.06 13:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Joginder Singh Rataul
State of Punjab
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
