Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

BSNL and Anr. Vs Naveen Sharma and Ors. — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

Home
Punjab & Haryana HC
2016
BSNL and Anr. Vs Naveen Sharma and Ors.BSNL and Anr. v. Naveen Sharma and Ors.

Dismissed

BSNL and Anr. v. Naveen Sharma and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC3 Oct 2016CWP/17752/2016

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

136 Civil Writ Petition No.17752 of 2016 Date of Decision: October 03, 2016

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and another

....Petitioners

versus

Naveen Sharma and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

Present: Mr. D.R. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)

The Challenge in this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is to the order dated 18.05.2016 ( Annexure P-6 ) passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh (respondent No.6) (in short 'CAT') in O.A. No.060/00605/2015, whereby while hearing the aforesaid O.A. along with connected O.A. No.060/00133/2015 titled as Shiv Kumar Sharma vs. Union of India and others (Annexure P-5), the Tribunal has restrained the petitioners to make promotions to the post of Sub-Divisional Engineer.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the original application filed by the petitioners has been decided by the CAT and in view thereof, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such. 3. Ordered accordingly.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE

October 03, 2016

(RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE

sonia gugnani

Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No

Whether reportable?

Yes/No

Sonia Kinra 2016.10.04 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
respondent
Naveen Sharma

Coram

AI extract

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
RAMENDRA JAIN

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Punjab & Haryana HC
Decided on: 3 Oct 2016 · October
Registered: 27 Aug 2016
Case no.: CWP/17752/2016
CNR: PHHC010826412016
Topic: Service and Employment
Bench: Surinder Gupta Daya Chaudhary
Disposal: DISPOSED OF

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Surinder Gupta Daya Chaudhary

M/S Sukhbir Poultry Farm through Its Proprietor Paramjit Singh and Another Vs the Authorised Officer, Central Bank of India, Ludhiana and Another
30 Sept 2016
M/S Maxair Industry Vs Ut of Chandigarh & Anr.
30 Sept 2016
Urmila Devi Vs State of Haryana and Others
30 Sept 2016
Ranjit Kaur & Ors. Vs Bank of India & Anr.
3 Oct 2016
Gurnam Singh Vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Anr.
3 Oct 2016
Kulwant Singh Vs Greater Area Mohali Development Authority Mohali and Ors.
3 Oct 2016

Cite this judgement

BSNL and Anr. v. Naveen Sharma and Ors., CWP/17752/2016 (P&H), decided on 3 October 2016.

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL and RAMENDRA JAIN

Parties & counsel