Gurnam Singh v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC3 Oct 2016CWP/17556/2016

Download

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Gurnam Singh Vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Anr. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶18

5&��%�(�&@�6��5$%%$(�?@�0��&�3!��4��5��&��$5��)@��%%�%)��)4��$��( ��'�($�)��(��55��&�)��$�� !��$�?$��!�'�� 55��) ��F;��F��( ��$ �,��'��($�� ! ��$�?$��!�'�� 55��)��F;��F�� !��$�?$��!�(�)�8$��('��5$�� 4��F+��!�%��55��)��4�9!�5!�9�%��$�&$5)$(��&$( $��5��( ��!$�"$5��5�&��)�� 6$�$(�(�6&�5�)$�&$( $��5��(�� 4�9!$�$��($?�)�$�)�@��$%��(��)��4��F+�9�%��) �$�&$5)$(��!$�%��(�(�6&�5�)$�&$( $��5��(�9�%��9��($(�)��)!$��$))&$�$�) �� !$�$��$4�9!�&$�6�@�� 5&��)�� !��$�?$�4�)!$�%��( �('��5$��)��4��F+�9�%��'$�6��(�)��!��#�($��5$��)$�(�)$( ��4�)!$�6$)�)��$��9�%��)��)$(�)!�)�)!$��'$��@�$�)�"$'�$9 ��))$$�<!$�$��)$��$�$��$(�)��%�H)!$��))$$->��)%��$$)�� !$&( ��!�%�($5�($(�)��$5�'$��E4��F+��(��4��;F+��)!$�!�� %�!�%�%!��$��'$�6��(��)��4��F+�)�� !��$�?$� !�'�� 55��)��( ��I4;E�F+�)��,��'��($�� !��$�?$� !�'�� 55��)��4��$%6$5)�'$&@��!$��))$$��)%��$$)�� !$&( ��;��;��$5��%�($�$(�)!$�5�%$��)!$�6$)�)��$��(�5��5&�($(�)!�) ��5��&%��)!$��$))&$�$�)�� 5&�(�� )!$�6$)�)��$��9$�$��$:��$(�)� &��8 �)!$ �5&��9�)! ��('��5$F6�@�$�) �"$ �%)$��?$��$ ��)!��B�� )!$ 6�@�$�)4�9!�5!�9�%��)�(��$�?@�)!$��!$�$��)$�4��$%6��($�)��'�($ &$))$��(�)$(��;��('�%$(�)!$�6$)�)��$��)��($6�%�)��4��;F+��%�6$� �� &��)�� (�)$(��#�($��)!$��&$))$��(�)$(��4 9!�&$��$�)�� )!�)�)!$�)�)�&�$=5$%%��)��4��F+�9�%��&�$�(@ �$5�'$�$(��(��)$�$%)��4�;�F+�9�%��$5�'$��?&$4�)!$�6$)�)��$��9�% �%8$(�)��($6�%�)��4�;�F+�?$�� !�%�%!��$�)�9��(%��)$�$%)�

¶28

�&&$ $(��'$�+6�@�$�)�9�%��($�)�� !�(�$�)��$ &� $�5$�� )!$�%��%�($'��(��$��)��)!$�9��))$��%)�)$�$�)��&$(�?$��$�)!$��?��&4 �$%6��($�)��'$��$(�)!�)�)!$�"$5��5�&��)�� !�%�)��'$��@�)!$ 5&��6)��)!$��5��&�@$��9!�5!��55��)%��$��$5��5�&$(��(��)!$ %�?%$:�$�)�6$��(4�)!$��$))&$�$�)�� !�%�)��5!$58�)!$�)��%�5)��%��)!$ ��%)��)�5�%$4�"$5��5�&��)�� (�(��)��$5��5�&$�)!$��55��)%��)!$ ��5��& �@$��EEE+��4 �(�� 9!�5! �� ! ��$�?$��)��8 �('��5$��4��F+��!$�$��$4��)�9�%��5��?$�)��6��)!$��5��&%��)!$ �$))&$�$�)�� 4��5&�(�� )!$�6$)�)��$�4�)��5!$58�)!$�)��%�5)��%��)!$ 9�)!(��9�&F�('��5$��$ �%)$�4�?�)�)!$@�(�(��)�(��%��)!$%$�5��5��%)��5$%4 &$��$(��?��&�!�%�� !)&@��?%$�'$(�)!�)�)!$�6$)�)��$��5��)�)�8$��@ ?$�$��)��)!$��&)��)!$�"$5��5�&��)�� 6�$6�� )!$�(�6&�5�)$ &$( $��5��(4��&)!�� !�� &�&$( $��5��(�9�%��&%��'��&�?&$4�?$5��%$��)!$ ��&) ��)!$ �"$5��5�&��)�� &%�4 ��5)��!�% �?$$��%$6��)$&@ �$5��$�($(�?@�)!$��))$$��,$�5$4��)�5��)�?$�%��(�)!�)�)!$�$�9�%�� $ &� $�5$��)!$�6$)�)��$��

Gurnam Singh v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Gurnam Singh v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Sukhbir Poultry Farm through Its Proprietor Paramjit Singh and Another Vs the Authorised Officer, Central Bank of India, Ludhiana and Another

M/S Maxair Industry Vs Ut of Chandigarh & Anr.

Urmila Devi Vs State of Haryana and Others

Ranjit Kaur & Ors. Vs Bank of India & Anr.

BSNL and Anr. Vs Naveen Sharma and Ors.

Kulwant Singh Vs Greater Area Mohali Development Authority Mohali and Ors.