The High Court allowed the petition and converted the interim order dated 18.10.2016 into an absolute order of anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) CrPC, noting the petitioners joined investigation and it was not custodial interrogation.
Interim order dated 18.10.2016 made absolute under Section 438(2) CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Cr. Misc. M 37029 of 2016 Date of decision: 8.12.2016
Ibrahim and another
Petitioners
vs.
State of Haryana
Respondent
Present: Mr. Arjun Atri, Advocate. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, AAG, Hry
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
On the instructions of HC Mohd. Hussain it has been informed that the petitioners have joined the investigation. It does not appear to be a case of custodial interrogation.
The petition is allowed. Interim order dated 18.10.2016 is hereby made absolute subject to all the conditions u/s 438(2)Cr.P.C.
December 8 ,2016 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE Whether speaking/ reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
Tapinder Singh Mann 2016.12.08 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim order dated 18.10.2016 regarding anticipatory bail should be made absolute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ibrahim
State of Haryana
M.M.S.BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
