High Court allowed a pre-arrest bail petition for the petitioner who joined the investigation, making an interim order dated 17.10.2016 absolute subject to conditions.
Interim order dated 17.10.2016 made absolute subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Cr. Misc. M 36823 of 2016 Date of decision: 8.12.2016
Arwinder Singh
Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab
Respondent
Present: Mr. JS Sandhu. Advocate Ms. Simsi Dhir, DAG, Punjab
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
On the instructions of SI Harish Kumar, it has been informed that the petitioner has joined the investigation. Similarly circumstanced coaccused has been granted the concession of pre-arrest bail by this court.
In view of the said circumstances, the petition is allowed. Interim order dated 17.10.2016 is hereby made absolute subject to all the conditions u/s 438(2) Cr.P.C.
December 8 ,2016 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE Whether speaking/ reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
Tapinder Singh Mann 2016.12.08 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, who has joined the investigation, is eligible for pre-arrest bail similar to a co-accused?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arwinder Singh
State of Punjab
M.M.S Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
