Ajit Singh Vs Director Rural Development & Panchayats Punjab and Ors.

(1) The petitioner alleges that the private respondents have encroached upon the Gram Panchayat land and have raised illegal constructions. He made a complaint followed by legal notice dated 12.09.2015 (P4) and has now approached this Court seeking a mandamus to direct the authorities to take necessary action. (2) Since we have not heard the private respondents at this stage and no order prejudicial to their interest is intended to be passed, the writ petition is disposed of without expressing any view on merits, with a direction to respondents No.3 to 5 to consider the petitioner’s legal notice, if any, received by them and take appropriate action in accordance with law and principles of natural justice within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

¶17

�� 

¶18

��

¶19

��

¶20

�� 

¶21

V.VISHAL 2015.12.04 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Ajit Singh v. Director Rural Development & Panchayats Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajit Singh v. Director Rural Development & Panchayats Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Avtar Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Paramjit Singh & Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Subhash Chand & Ors. Vs Commissioner Rohtak Divn & Ors.

Bachna Ram Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Rampal and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Gaurav and Ors. Vs Municipal Corpoartion Chandigarh