Dismissed
Bachna Ram v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/24975/2015
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Headnote: Not available
What the court decided
AI extract
Headnote: Not available
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.24975 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.12.2015
Bachna Ram
... Petitioner
VS.
State of Haryana & Ors. ... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner
SURYA KANT, J. (Oral)
(1) The petitioner’s grievance in this writ petition is against the alleged inaction of the revenue authorities who statedly have failed to carry out necessary corrections in the revenue record in respect of the land owned by the Gram Panchayat.
(2) It appears that the petitioner would be well within his rights to approach the Assistant Collector, First Grade, in this regard who would surely decide his application in accordance with law.
(3) With liberty aforementioned, the writ petition stands disposed of.
������������� ������
����������� ����������������� �������������� ������
V.VISHAL 2015.12.03 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Bachna Ram
State of Haryana
Surya Kant
P.B. Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court