Disposed

Ankit Rana & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC30 Oct 2015CWP/22763/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a notice of motion, this High Court granted an interim direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Karnal, to consider the petitioners' grievance regarding delimitation of wards and voter list publication before the Gram Panchayat elections, without expressing views on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Deputy Commissioner, Karnal, to consider the petitioners' grievance vide legal notice and take necessary action in accordance with law before the elections.

Ankit Rana & Anr. Vs State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.22763 of 2015 Date of Decision: October 30, 2015

¶3

Ankit Rana and another

¶4

....Petitioners

¶5

versus

¶6

State of Haryana and others

¶7

.....Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

¶9

Present: Mr.Vijay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Kirti Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

¶10

-.-

¶11

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶12

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶13

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶14

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

¶15

Notice of motion.

¶16

On our asking, Ms.Kirti Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶17

Let six copies of the writ petition be supplied to the State counsel during the course of day failing which this order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶18

In view of the nature of order which we propose to pass, it is not necessary to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage.

¶19

The petitioners are residents of village Salwan, Tehsil Assandh, District Karnal. They are claiming to have submitted objections followed by a legal notice against delimitation of wards and consequential publication of voter list.

¶20

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.10.31 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶21

CWP No.22763 of 2015

¶22

[2]

¶23

The State Election Commission vide its letter dated 01.10.2015, original whereof has been shown to us, has forwarded the above-stated legal notice to the Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Election Officer (Panchayat), Karnal for necessary action. In this view of the matter and without expressing any views on merits we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Karnal to consider the grievance raised by the petitioners vide the above-mentioned legal notice and take necessary action as may be required in accordance with law, before the Gram Panchayat elections are held.

¶24

Ordered accordingly.

¶25

Dasti.

¶26

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE October 30, 2015 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE

¶27

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.10.31 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Ankit Rana & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankit Rana & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Municipal Committee Ganaur Vs Commissioner Rohtak Division & Ors.

M/S Parma Nand Joginder Pal Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Sunil Kumar Mahajan & Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Manphool Singh Vs Director General Consolidation Haryana & Ors.

Parkash and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Brahm Dutt and Anr. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.