Disposed

Sunil Kumar Mahajan & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC29 Oct 2015CWP/22794/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenging alleged discrimination regarding policy guidelines for marriage palaces. Court disposed of the writ petition without deciding on merits, directing the Chief Administrator of PUDA to consider petitioners' representation and pass a reasoned order within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Chief Administrator, PUDA to consider petitioners' representation and decide by reasoned order within three months.

Sunil Kumar Mahajan & Ors. Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

¶3

CWP No.22794 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.10.2015

¶4

¶5

Sunil Kumar Mahajan & Ors. ... Petitioners

¶6

VS.

¶7

State of Punjab & Ors. ... Respondents

¶8

¶9

CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI

¶10

¶11

Present: Mr. JS Pannu, Advocate for Mr. JS Gill, Advocate for the petitioners

¶12

¶13

SURYA KANT, J. (Oral)

¶14

(1) The petitioners claim themselves to be the owners of their respective marriage palaces located in the State of Punjab. Their grievance appears to be that the authorities are not faithfully complying with the directions/view taken by this Court in the judgement dated 10.01.2014 (P1) as clarified vide subsequent orders dated 28.11.2014 and 24.09.2015 (P2 & P3, respectively).

¶15

(2) The petitioners further allege that the authorities are acting in a discriminatory manner in giving effect to the policy guidelines of 2012 to the marriage palaces constructed before or after the year 2007. It is in this backdrop that the petitioners have submitted a representation to the Chairman, PUDA (P4) and one of the prayers in this writ petition is to direct the authorities to consider the issues raised in that representation.

¶16

V.VISHAL 2015.11.05 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶17

��

¶18

�� ��

¶19

(3) In this view of the matter and without expressing any views on merit, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the Chief Administrator, PUDA to consider the above-mentioned claim of the petitioners which is also contained in representation dated 06.10.2015 (P4) and decide the same by passing a reasoned order within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

¶20

(4) Ordered accordingly.

�� 

��

��

��

��

V.VISHAL 2015.11.05 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Sunil Kumar Mahajan & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar Mahajan & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanaullah Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Mohinder Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Singara Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Municipal Committee Ganaur Vs Commissioner Rohtak Division & Ors.

M/S Parma Nand Joginder Pal Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Nishan Singh & Anr. Vs Stae Election Commissioner Haryana & Ors.