Disposed

Parkash and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC30 Oct 2015CWP/22551/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition, filed by BPL residents of village Riwazpur in Faridabad, sought allotment of plots under the Mahatma Gandhi Gramin Basti Yojna. The Court directed the Respondents to verify the claimants' eligibility and take a decision within four months without adjudicating on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondents to verify the claimants' eligibility and take an appropriate decision within four months.

Parkash and Ors. Vs State of Haryana… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.22551 of 2015 Date of Decision: October 30, 2015

¶3

Parkash and others .....Petitioners

¶4

versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

¶6

Present: Mr.Gaurav Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶7

-.-

¶8

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶9

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶10

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶11

¶12

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

¶13

The petitioners are residents of village Riwazpur, Tehsil and District Faridabad. They claim themselves to be living Below the Poverty Line (BPL) to whom the Gram Panchayat decided to allot plots of 100 square yards. Their grievance is that though they are fully eligible for such allotment under the 'Mahatma Gandhi Gramin Basti Yojna' which the State Government has decided to implement vide Policy memo dated 01.12.2008, the respondents are still not considering their claim. It appears from the averments that an exercise to identify the eligible persons was undertaken and the petitioners were found eligible but the follow up action by the Deputy Commissioner, Faridabad or Gram Panchayat of their village is still awaited.

¶14

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners have placed reliance on a Government Policy which, according to

¶15

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.11.04 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶16

CWP No.22551 of 2015 [2]

¶17

them, has not been given effect, we dispose of this writ petition, however without expressing any views on the merits, with a direction to respondent nos.2 and 3 to verify the claim of the petitioners as contained in this petition and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

¶18

Ordered accordingly.

¶19

Dasti.

¶20

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE October 30, 2015 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE

¶21

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.11.04 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Parkash and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parkash and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Municipal Committee Ganaur Vs Commissioner Rohtak Division & Ors.

M/S Parma Nand Joginder Pal Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Sunil Kumar Mahajan & Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Manphool Singh Vs Director General Consolidation Haryana & Ors.

Brahm Dutt and Anr. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Ankit Rana & Anr. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.