Remanded

Sanjeet Kumar and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC22 Sept 2015CWP/20223/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners resident of village Atela Kalan sought inclusion in the electoral roll and issuance of voter cards. The High Court, without expressing views on merits, directed the Deputy Commissioner, Bhiwani, to examine the grievance and redress it within one week.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Bhiwani, to look into the grievance of the petitioners and redress the same within one week.

Sanjeet Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Haryana… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.20223 of 2015 Date of Decision: September 22, 2015

¶3

Sanjeet Kumar and others .....Petitioners

¶4

versus

¶5

State of Haryana and others

¶6

.....Respondents

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

¶8

Present: Mr.Vijay Kumar Sheoran, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Kirti Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

¶9

-.-

¶10

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶11

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶12

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶13

¶14

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

¶15

Notice of motion.

¶16

On our asking, Ms.Kirti Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶17

Let four copies of the writ petition be supplied to the State counsel during the course of day failing which this order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶18

In view of the nature of order which we propose to pass, it is not necessary to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage.

¶19

The petitioners are residents of village Atela Kalan, Tehsil Charkhi Dadri, District Bhiwani. They seek a direction for inclusion of their names in the electoral roll and issue them voter cards as they have attained the age of 18 years.

¶20

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.09.28 12:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶21

[2]

¶22

CWP No.20223 of 2015

¶23

Since the above-stated claim requires a fact-finding enquiry, we dispose of this writ petition without expressing any views on merits, with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Bhiwani to look into the above-mentioned grievance of the petitioners and redress the same in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

Ordered accordingly.

Dasti.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE

September 22, 2015 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE

¶28

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.09.28 12:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Sanjeet Kumar and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeet Kumar and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Deepak Builders Vs Chandigarh Administration & Ors.

Balbahadur Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Jaswant Singh Matharoo and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

M/S Sharma Fruit Company Bhawanigarh and Ors. Vs Administrator New Mandi Township Punjab and Ors.

Baldev Singh and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Kabaj Ram Gorsi and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.