Kabaj Ram Gorsi and Anr. v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court directed Deputy Commissioner to investigate petitioners claim for voter list correction regarding their residence after retirement. Court disposed of the writ petition without expressing views on merits due to the need for fact-finding.
What did the court decide?
Direction to Deputy Commissioner, Kaithal to investigate and redress the grievance within one week.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.20190 of 2015 Date of Decision: September 22, 2015
Kabaj Ram Gorsi and another
versus
Chief Election Commission, Haryana and others .....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.
Present: Mr.Naresh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Kirti Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
-.-
- Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
- To be referred to the Reporters or not?
- Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kabaj Ram Gorsi
- petitioner
another
- respondent
Chief Election Commission, Haryana
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/20190/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court