Disposed

Jaswant Singh Matharoo and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC9 Sept 2015CWP/19004/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners alleging illegal constructions by ground-floor occupants sought writ direction for action. Court directed Respondents 2 & 3 to deploy enforcement team within three months to verify allegations mandatorily issue show cause notice to any accused before punitive action is taken clarifying no merits opinion is expressed due to lack of impleaded occupants in case.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to deploy enforcement team within 3 months to verify allegations and issue show cause notice before punitive action.

Jaswant Singh Matharoo and Ors… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.19004 of 2015 Date of Decision: September 09, 2015

¶3

Jaswant Singh Matharoo and others

¶4

.....Petitioners

¶5

versus

¶6

State of Punjab and others

¶7

.....Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

¶9

¶10

Present: Mr.M.S.Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶11

-.-

¶12

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶13

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶14

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶15

¶16

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

¶17

The petitioners are residents of Housefed Complex, Phase-X, SAS Nagar Mohali. They are said to have been allotted dwelling units on the first floor. They allege that several occupants of the ground-floor units have made unauthorized and illegal constructions without getting the building-plan sanctioned from the Competent Authority. It is also their case that besides several complaints and representations made by them they also served the respondents with a legal notice dated 06.08.2013 (P-5). However, finding no consequential action, the instant writ petition has been filed. Reliance is made on the observations/directions issued by this Court in exercise of PIL jurisdiction in CWP No.4886 of 2003 (Court on its own motion versus State of Punjab and another, decided on 04.10.2008.

¶18

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.09.14 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶19

[2]

¶20

CWP No.19004 of 2015

¶21

It may be mentioned that the petitioners have not impleaded the allottees/occupants of the flats who have allegedly made encroachments or illegal constructions. Since no order prejudicial to the interest of a person can be passed without hearing him, we clarify that these directions shall not be construed as an expression of our views on merits.

¶22

There is no gain saying that the local-authorities including respondent Nos.2 & 3 are expected to take timely action to ensure that a well-planned township is not marred by illegal or unauthorized constructions which have no sanctity in law.

¶23

The writ petition is thus disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to deploy their enforcement team to ascertain the correctness of allegations made by the petitioners in their legal notice (P-5), referred to above. The follow-up action shall depend upon such enquiry. It is further made clear that no punitive action shall be taken against any person without issuing an appropriate show cause notice to him. Needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

Ordered accordingly.

Dasti.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE

September 09, 2015 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE

¶28

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.09.14 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Jaswant Singh Matharoo and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaswant Singh Matharoo and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhupinder Kaur Vs Ut of Chandigarh & Ors.

Jatinder Pal Singh S/O Ranjit Singh Wahniwal Vs High Court of Pb. & Hry., Chd Thru Reg. Gen.& Anr.

Jatinder Pal Singh Vs High Court of Punjab and Haryana Chandigarh

Balbahadur Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Pawan Kumar Vs Election Commission of India and Ors.

M/S Deepak Builders Vs Chandigarh Administration & Ors.