Disposal of a writ petition failing to aver requirements for changing land nature; directions left for future approach.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.17924 of 2015 Date of Decision: August 27, 2015
Sube Singh and another
.....Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH.
Present: Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
-.-
The petitioners have nowhere averred in the writ petition that the Gram Panchayat has passed any resolution to change the nature of Ghade Khad land to any other common purpose. As and when such a resolution, if passed, the petitioners may approach the Deputy Commissioner, Karnal or any other Authority who shall decide their objections in accordance with law.
The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.
[SURYA KANT] JUDGE
August 27, 2015 [JASPAL SINGH] mohinder JUDGE
MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.08.31 11:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Sube Singh and another
State of Haryana
SURYA KANT
JASPAL SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
