Disposed

Karnail Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC26 Aug 2015CWP/17760/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of a writ petition where the petitioner complained about lack of repair to phirni and failure to remove encroachments. The court directed the respondent to verify allegations and take remedial steps within three months without deciding on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to verify allegations and take remedial steps within three months.

Karnail Singh Vs State of Haryana… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.17760 of 2015 Date of Decision: August 26, 2015

Karnail Singh

.....Petitioner

versus

State of Haryana and others

¶7

.....Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH.

¶9

Present: Mr.Kuldeep S.Ahluwalia, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶10

-.-

¶11

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶12

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶13

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶14

¶15

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

¶16

The grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is that the Gram Panchayat of village Sulkhani, Tehsil Shahabad, District Kurukshetra or the other authorities are neither repairing/constructing the phirni of the village nor the encroachments made thereupon are being removed. The petitioner himself is a resident of the said village and is said to have made repeated representations including dated 06.05.2011, 19.05.2012 and 14.03.2012 (P-6, P-7 & P-8, respectively) followed by a legal notice dated 16.12.2013 (P-10). As no effective steps have been taken by the authorities to remove the encroachments or to repair/reconstruct the phirni, that the instant writ petition has been filed.

¶17

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought, however, without expressing any views on merits of the allegations, we dispose

¶18

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.09.02 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶19

CWP No.17760 of 2015 [2]

¶20

of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to verify the above-mentioned allegations made by the petitioner and take remedial steps within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

¶21

Ordered accordingly.

¶22

Dasti.

¶23

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE August 26, 2015 [JASPAL SINGH] mohinder JUDGE

¶24

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.09.02 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Karnail Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karnail Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogesh Kumar Sharma and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Gram Panchayat of Vill Adda Jhabal and Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Ram Partap Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Kamlesh Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Kanwarjeet Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Sube Singh and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.