Petitioner's criminal miscellaneous petition was withdrawn by his counsel owing to the prosecution's case being at an advanced stage and expected to conclude shortly. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-13834 of 2014 Date of Decision: January 20, 2015
Harjinder Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.S.K.Passi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Shilesh Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Gurpreet Singh, Police Station, Sadar, Kotkapura, District Faridkot, submits that out of nine, four prosecution witnesses have been given up, one has been examined and another witness has partly been examined. He further submits that the case before learned trial court is fixed for 30.01.2015 for remaining prosecution witnesses and in all probabilities the prosecution would conclude its case on the said date.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
January 20, 2015 seema
(Naresh Kumar Sanghi) Judge
SEEMA RANI 2015.01.21 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
HARJINDER SINGH
STATE OF PUNJAB
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
