A civil revision matter where the petitioners failed to appear for hearing on multiple occasions, leading to the dismissal of the petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRM-M-13411-2012 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-13411-2012 (O&M)
Date of Decision: January 20, 2015
Harinder Singh @ Harjinder Singh and others
…Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. K.S. Pannu, DAG, Punjab, for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate, for respondent No. 2.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (Oral)
It is already 2:45 p.m. No one has proposed to put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. Earlier also, on several occasions either no one appeared for the petitioners or written request for adjournment of the case was sought on behalf of the petitioners.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) January 20, 2015 JUDGE Pkapoor
PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.01.21 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Harinder Singh @ Harjinder Singh and others
State of Punjab
another
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
