Disposed of as infructuous after petitioner reported compliance with this Court's earlier directions regarding provision of a gunman.
Disposed of as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 2576 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision: February 23, 2015
Pinki and anr.
1Petitioners
Versus
Patram Singh, SP, Palwal
... Respondent
������ ����������������������������������������
Present: : Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Hitesh Pandey, Addl. A.G., Haryana
�����������������������
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in terms of the directions of this Court in Crl. Misc. No.22008 of 2012, one gunman has been provided to the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid fact, the instant contempt petition
is disposed of as having become infructous.
23.02.2015 (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU) dinesh JUDGE
DINESH KUMAR 2015.02.23 06:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Pinki and anr.
Patram Singh, SP, Palwal
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
DINESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
