The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held that since a speaking order dated 11.2.2015 rejected the petitioner's claim for voluntary retirement, the current writ petition became infructuous and was disposed of accordingly.
Rule discharged; petitioner at liberty to challenge the order dated 11.2.2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
217
�������������������������
Maghar Singh �Petitioner
Versus
Dr.Roshan Sankaria and another �Respondents
������ �������������������������� ������!���� ��
Present: * Mr.Mukand Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Kamaldeep Singh Sidhu, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.
����� ������!���� ��"����
A short affidavit of Shri T.K.Goyal, Director, Public
Instructions (Colleges), Punjab on behalf of respondent No.2 has been filed, wherein, it is stated that in compliance with the order dated 20.8.2013 passed in CWP No.6573 of 1995, the claim of the petitioner for voluntary retirement was considered and a speaking order dated 11.2.2015 (Annexure R*1) has been passed rejecting his claim.
In view of above, the instant petition has become infructuous. Disposed of accordingly.
Rule discharged.
Needless to state that the petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the order (Annexure R*1), in accordance with law.
#$%&'(&)����"���� ������ ������!���� ���* gian ������������������ !�
gian
GIANENDER KUMAR 2015.02.26 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Maghar Singh
Dr. Roshan Sankaria
another
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
