This judgment disposed of a writ petition where the court found that a speaking order had been passed pursuant to earlier directions. The petition was disposed of as no further orders were required, with liberty granted to challenge the impugned order.
Petition disposed; liberty granted to challenge the order passed by authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
220
������������������������� Date of Decision ����������������������
Surjit Kaur and others
%Petitioners
Versus
Gurnam Singh Raipuri and others %Respondents
��� �� !��"#$%�����&'()�%��! ��+%��(�,!�(+!'
Present: + Mr.Umesh Kumar Kanwar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.Ajaib Singh, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.
Mr.R.S.Manhas, Advocate for respondent No.3.
! ��+%��(�,!�(*+!'���&�
Learned State counsel states that pursuant to the directions issued in CWP No.2456 of 2013, the application of the petitioners has been considered and a speaking order has been passed.
Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid factual position.
In view of above, no further orders are required to be passed in this petition and it is disposed of accordingly.
Rule discharged.
Needless to state that the petitioners shall have the liberty
to challenge the order passed by the authorities in accordance with law.
������������������ �! ��+%��(�,!�(*+!'� gian ���������������������&'+,%
gian
GIANENDER KUMAR 2015.02.26 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Surjit Kaur and others
Gurnam Singh Raipuri and others
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
