The petitioner and respondent agreed that the impugned order had been complied with. The court held the petition was infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VINOD KUMAR 2015.12.17 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1523 of 2015 (O&M) Date of decision:17.12.2015
Attar Singh ...Petitioner
Versus
Sh. Vinay Singh, IAS ...Respondent
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: Mr. Ram Niwas Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. P.P.Chahar, DAG, Haryana. *****
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral)
Both the parties are ad idem that since the order passed by this
Court has been complied with, therefore, this petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous accordingly.
December 17, 2015 ( Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge
Attar Singh
Sh. Vinay Singh, IAS
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
