Counsel stated the earlier order was complied with via payment with interest; court dismissed petition as infructuous but granted liberty to apply if compliance is found vague.
Liberty granted to petitioner to file appropriate application if respondent's statement of payment is found vague.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-2505-2015 Date of decision : 15.12.2015
Harbhajan Singh
........... Petitioner
Vs
Manmohan Singh Randhawa
........... Respondent
Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Arora, Advocate for the respondent.
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (oral)
Counsel for the respondent has orally submitted that the order passed by this Court has been duly complied with as the amount due to the petitioner has already been paid with interest.
In view thereof, the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
However, counsel for the petitioner has feigned ignorance, therefore, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file appropriate application in case the petitioner ultimately founds the statement of the respondent vague.
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN)
15.12.2015
JUDGE
sp
SATYAWAN 2015.12.18 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Harbhajan Singh
Manmohan Singh Randhawa
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
