Monika Beniwal v. T C Gupta and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VINOD KUMAR 2015.12.17 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1198 of 2015 Date of decision:17.12.2015
Monika Beniwal
...Petitioner
Versus
Mr. T.C. Gupta and another
...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: Mr. Chiranji Lal, Advocate, for Mr. Lokesh K. Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. P.P.Chahar, DAG, Haryana.
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral)
Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that since the order passed by this Court has been complied with, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous accordingly.
December 17, 2015 ( Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge
Monika Beniwal
Mr. T.C. Gupta
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court