Petitioner sought relief in a service petition. Respondent counsel stated that the disputed amount due to the petitioner had already been paid, rendering the petition infructuous. The single-judge bench dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1370-2015 Date of decision : 18.12.2015
Jaipal Jangra
........... Petitioner
Vs
Hardeep Kumar and others
........... Respondents
Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Deepak Manchanda, Addl. A.G. Haryana.
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (oral)
Counsel for the respondent has stated that though the
status report has not been filed but as per his information the amount due to the petitioner has already been paid.
In view thereof, the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
In case the information, on the basis of which counsel
for the respondent has made the statement, is not found correct, counsel for the petitioner may file an application for revival of this petition.
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN)
18.12.2015
JUDGE
sp
SATYAWAN 2015.12.19 14:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Jaipal Jangra
Hardeep Kumar and others
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
