The appellant sought withdrawal of the appeal to file a civil suit for apportioning liability between two drivers. The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file civil suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.5740 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 11, 2014
New India Ass. Co. Ltd.
...Appellant
Versus
Simran & Ors.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI Present: Mr.R.C.Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the present appeal to enable the appellant to file civil suit for inter se apportionment of the liability amongst two drivers of the offending vehicles.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
August 11, 2014 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
August 11, 2014
Sharma Seema 2014.08.11 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
New India Ass. Co. Ltd.
Simran
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
