The High Court dismissed the claimants' appeal for further enhancement of compensation dated 2005 due to non-prosecution as appellants were unrepresented and had lost interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.1808 of 2005 (O&M) Date of decision:25.07.2014
Bilka Ram and another
....Appellants
Versus
Prithi Singh and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present:- None for the appellants.
Mr. Ravinder Arora, Advocate for the respondent -Insurance Company.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)
This is claimants' appeal seeking further enhancement of
compensation. This appeal pertains to the year 2005 and no one is forthcoming to represent the appellants and the appellants have remained un-represented. It seems that appellants have lost interest in pursuing the instant appeal.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
July 25, 2014 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE
Kadian Savita 2014.08.02 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Bilka Ram and another
Prithi Singh and others
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
