A brief order dismissing a claimants' appeal challenging an award of compensation for negligence on grounds of non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.2161 of 2000 (O&M) Date of decision:24.07.2014
Mamo Devi and others
....Appellants
Versus
Baljit Singh and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present:- None for the appellants.
Mr. Suman Jain, Advocate for respondent No.3.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)
This is claimants' appeal challenging the impugned Award
whereby the claimants have been awarded compensation of ` 50,000/- under no fault liability. In the instant appeal, the findings on the question of negligence are being questioned by the claimants.
No one is present on behalf of the appellants.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
A copy of this order be sent to the appellants through
registered post.
July 24, 2014
savita
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE
Kadian Savita 2014.07.26 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Kadian Savita 2014.07.26 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Mamo Devi and others
Baljit Singh and others
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
