The court held that the appeal was rendered infructuous because the impugned award was set aside on a subsequent appeal by the Insurance Company. Orders were passed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.1420 of 1998 (O&M) Date of decision:24.07.2014
Veerpal Kaur and another
....Appellants
Versus
Jit Singh and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present:- Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate for the appellants.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)
Counsel for the appellants states that the instant appeal has been rendered infructuous as the impugned Award itself has been set aside on an appeal filed on behalf of the Insurance Company and the appellants have been awarded compensation of ` 50,000/- under no fault liability.
Ordered accordingly.
July 24, 2014 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE
Kadian Savita 2014.07.26 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Veerpal Kaur
Jit Singh
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
