Petitioner filed a writ petition. Court held the petition had become infructuous and disposed of the matter with liberty to revive it if necessary.
Liberty to revive the petition if instructions show the lis is alive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.9653 of 2000(O&M) Date of Decision: 30.01.2014
Shiv Charan Dass
... Petitioner
Versus
Punjab State and others
... Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
Present:Mr. J.S. Verka, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Puri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondents No.1 to 5.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition has become infructuous.
Disposed of, accordingly, with liberty to revive it in case any instructions are received showing that the lis is alive.
( SANJAY KISHAN KAUL ) CHIEF JUSTICE
( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE
January 30, 2014
Rajan
Rajan Kumar 2014.01.31 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Shiv Charan Dass
Punjab State
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
ARUN PALLI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
