The Court dismissed the writ petition, relying on a prior Division Bench judgment (CWP No.11015 of 2005 held that the matter was already covered.
The writ petition was dismissed in view of a prior Division Bench judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.2836-CAT of 2007 Date of Decision: 30.01.2014
Union of India and others
... Petitioners
Versus
Narinder Singh and others
... Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
Present:Mr. Arupinder Singh Grewal, Senior Panel Counsel, for the petitioners-UOI.
None for the respondents.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition is covered against the impugned order by a judgment passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.11015 of 2005 titled Union of India and others v. Madan Lal and others decided on 16.02.2009.
In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition is also dismissed in view of the aforesaid judgment.
( SANJAY KISHAN KAUL ) CHIEF JUSTICE
( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE
January 30, 2014
Rajan
Rajan Kumar 2014.01.31 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Union of India and others v. Madan Lal and othersFollowed¶13
CWP No.11015 of 2005 titled Union of India and others v. Madan Lal and others decided on 16.02.2009
Union of India and others
Narinder Singh and others
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
