Rahis Ansari v. Union of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition under Articles 226/227, the petitioner sought restoration and compensation for a hand-cart seized in 1995. The Court noted the petitioner failed to obtain a licence or comply with prior orders releasing the cart. Despite these facts, the Court allowed the petition and directed payment of compensation.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondents to make payment of Rs. 20,000 towards the cost of the hand-cart within four weeks.