The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous since the term of the Managing Committee of the Society had expired, leaving no substantive issue for adjudication.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 3177 of 2001
Date of Decision: 14.11.2014
Baljeet Singh and Others
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
The State of Punjab and Others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta.
Present: Mr. Harit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. V. Ram Swaroop, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3.
Rajan Gupta, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that present writ
petition has been rendered infructuous as term of Managing Committee of the Society has expired.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(Rajan Gupta) Judge
November 14, 2014 “DK”
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2014.11.14 14:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Baljeet Singh and Others
The State of Punjab and Others
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
