The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside Civil Writ Petition No. 13951 of 2000 because the petitioner advised that the petition had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 13951 of 2000
Date of Decision: 14.11.2014
Fateh Singh
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
The State of Haryana and Others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta.
Present: Mr. B.R.Rana, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3.
Rajan Gupta, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present petition
has been rendered infructuous. This stand is not controverted by
learned State counsel.
Under the circumstances, petition is dismissed as such.
(Rajan Gupta) Judge
November 14, 2014 “DK”
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2014.11.14 14:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Fateh Singh and Others
The State of Haryana and Others
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
