Allowed regular second appeal based on a parallel writ petition decision regarding findings between parties, set aside lower court orders, and dismissed the suit.
Set aside orders passed by courts below and dismissed the suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.1720 of 1988 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.11.2014
Pritam Singh & Ors. . . . . Appellants
VS.
Natha Singh & Ors. . . . . Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SHEKHER DHAWAN
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. Deepak Thapar, Advocate for the appellants
Mr. ML Saini, Advocate for the respondents
SURYA KANT, J. (Oral)
In view of the finding given by us in the writ petition inter se parties decided vide an even-dated order passed in CWP No.2014 of 1987 titled as Kewal Singh & Anr. vs. Additional Director, Consolidation of Holdings, Punjab & Anr. , the present Regular Second Appeal is allowed; the orders passed by Courts below is set aside and the suit is dismissed.
������������� ������
�����������
��������������
�����������������
������
V.VISHAL 2014.11.19 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Pritam Singh & Ors.
Natha Singh & Ors.
Surya Kant
Shekher Dhawan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
