The High Court directed the petitioner not to press the writ petition as he could avail the alternate remedy by approaching the Labour Court which had passed an ex parte order against him.
Petitioner directed not to press the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 24430 of 2013 Date of decision: 04.04.2014
Vijay Goyal
...Petitioner(s)
Versus
The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hisar and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner does not
press the present petition on the ground that he wishes to avail his alternate
remedy by approaching the Labour Court which had passed the impugned order ex parte at his back.
Ordered accordingly.
04.04.2014 shivani
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
Gupta Shivani 2014.04.09 15:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Vijay Goyal
The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hisar and others
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
