Petitioners filed a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to complete a pending enquiry. The Court found no ground for such a direction and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed. Petitioners at liberty to move application before appropriate authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P.No 22690 of 2014
Date of Decision: November 11, 2014.
Sukhdev Singh and others
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. M.K.Sajjan, Advocate for the petitioners.
Rajan Gupta, J (Oral)
Petitioners have sought a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct respondent No.5 to complete the pending enquiry. I find no ground to issue such direction of this nature.
Dismissed.
Petitioners shall, however, be at liberty to move an application
before the appropriate authority.
(Rajan Gupta) Judge
November 11, 2014. BB
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should direct the respondent to complete the pending enquiry under mandamus.
Sukhdev Singh and others
State of Punjab and others
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
