In this writ petition, the petitioners sought expedited disposal of a representation dated 13.3.2014 via paragraph representation. The Court directed the respondent to decide the representation expeditiously.
Direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the representation filed by the petitioners expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.18964of2014(O&M)
DATE OF DECISION: 12.09.2014
Gajraj and others
…..Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEASHUTOSH MOHUNTA,ACTINGCHIEFJUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present: Mr. Sudhanshu Makkar, Advocate for the petitioners
ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral):
The relief claimed by the petitioners in this writ
petition has also been claimed by them by making a representation
dated 13.3.2014 (Annexure P-5). Learned counsel submits that the
petitioners would be satisfied if their representation is ordered
to be decided expeditiously.
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, this
writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2
to decide the representation filed by the petitioners
expeditiously.
(ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA)
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
12.09.2014 (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU)
parkash*JUDGE
PARKASH CHAND 2014.09.12 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the State to decide the petitioners' representation expeditiously.
Gajraj and others
State of Haryana and others
Ashutosh Mohanta
Harinder Singh Sidhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court