The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the respondent to decide the petitioner's representation dated 13.2.2014 within three months.
Direction to respondent No.1 to decide the representation dated 13.2.2014 expeditiously, preferably within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.12740of2014(O&M)
DATE OF DECISION: 12.09.2014
Mohan Lal
…..Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEASHUTOSH MOHUNTA,ACTINGCHIEFJUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present: Mr. V.K. Jain, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Ajit Malik, Advocate for the petitioner
ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral):
The short prayer made by learned counsel for the
petitioner in this writ petition is that his representation dated
13.2.2014 (Annexure P-8) be ordered to be decided by respondent
No.1.
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, we
dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.1
to decide the representation (Annexure P-8) expeditiously,
preferably, within a period of three months from the date of
receipt of certified copy of this order.
(ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA)
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
12.09.2014 (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU)
parkash*JUDGE
PARKASH CHAND 2014.09.12 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent No.1 is directed to decide the petitioner's representation dated 13.2.2014 expeditiously.
Mohan Lal
State of Haryana
Ashutosh Mohanta
Harinder Singh Sidhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court