Petitioner sought to withdraw writ petition; application allowed and petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 11475 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:Feb. 17,2014
M/s Vatika Limited, Gurgaon .............................. Petitioner
Versus
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd (DHBVNL) and others ............................................... Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri
Present: Mr. Rohit Khanna, Advocate for the petitioner/s.
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
Allowed to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn.
( RITU BAHRI ) JUDGE
17.2.2014 rupi
Kaur Rupinder 2014.02.18 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
M/s Vatika Limited
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
