The court referred the judgment regarding the trial proceedings in CWP No. 10530 of 2014 to the Reporters and Digest, following the order passed in CWP No. 10493 of 2014.
Order referred to the Reporters and Digest as per the connected order in CWP No. 10493 of 2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.10530 of 2014 Date of Decision: May 27, 2014 Harwinder Singh ……Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ……Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL.
Present : Mr.Ritesh Pandey, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs.Jaspal K.Gurna, Central Government Standing Counsel for Union of India-respondent No.1. Mr.Rishi Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2. Mr.P.S.Bajwa, Addl. AG, Punjab, for respondent No.3.
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
For orders, see order of even date passed in CWP No.10493 of 2014 (Amar Nath versus Union of India and
others).
[SURYA KANT] JUDGE
May 27, 2014 [LISA GILL] Mohinder JUDGE
Kumar Mohinder 2014.05.28 15:14 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
No substantive issues identified as the order is for reference only.
Harwinder Singh
Union of India
Surya Kant
Lisa Gill
Kumar Mohinder
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
