The high court dismissed the appellant's petition as it was not pressed during hearing, as the trial courts next date was already scheduled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CRM-M-9650-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 09, 2014
Suresh
.....Petitioner
v.
The State of Haryana
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.Rahul Vats, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr.Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the State submits that except one, the prosecution has already examined all the witnesses and the next date before the learned trial Court is 15.10.2014.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as not pressed.
September 09, 2014 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE
MEENU 2014.09.11 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
Suresh
The State of Haryana
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
