Petitioner sought directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. but requested withdrawal of the petition as it became infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-25341 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 25, 2014
Gurbux Kaur
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.Ravinder Sharma, Advocate for Mr.H.S.Batth, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr.K.D.Sachdeva, Additional A.G.Punjab.
Mr.D.K.Bhatti, Advocate for respondents no.4 to 6.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of directions to respondents no.2 and 3.
It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition as the same has become infructuous.
Dismissed as withdrawn as having been rendered infructuous.
25.2.2014 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge
Meenu 2014.02.26 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gurbux Kaur
State of Punjab
RAM CHAND GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
