Petitioners' request for permission to withdraw their criminal miscellaneous petition was allowed by the court as the petition had become infructuous.
Permission to withdraw the petition was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-22351 of 2013
Date of decision : February 03, 2014
Krishna Devi and another
... Petitioners
vs.
State of Punjab and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Shiv Chouhan, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Manhas, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Varun Sharma, AAG, Punjab.
SURINDER GUPTA, J
Reply, by way of affidavit filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 today in the Court, is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the police has contacted the petitioners and recorded their statements. Now the instant petition has become infructuous and seeks permission to withdraw the same. Request allowed.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
February 03, 2014 (Surinder Gupta) deepak Judge
Deepak Kumar 2014.02.06 18:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document which has been signed by the Hon'ble Bench High Court, Chandigarh
Krishna Devi and another
State of Punjab and others
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
